Christopher Taylor's Astro-notes
... and a bit more. Welcome to this personal
astro-notes website – thank you for taking an interest!
Inroductions:
What
this website is about
Its
content
Use of
mathematics and physics
The author
Attributions
and acknowledgements
INDEX
What this website is about
Astronomy! More specifically, a personal ‘take’ on the
science of astronomy, its history, principles and
observational practice, based on the writer’s more than 55
years’ experience of doing, studying, lecturing on and for
many years teaching the subject.
The material here, mostly text, with some photos, diagrams and
personal observational drawings, is broadly aimed at
explaining some of the basic principles of astronomy &
astrophysics, together with the directly relevant physics and
mathematics, for a readership of late school-years and early
university students, amateur astronomers and other
interested parties. The observational material, at least,
should be easily accessible to all, whether having any
scientific background or none, but most has been included here
to tell some specific story about the science involved.
Its content:
This website is in the earliest stages of construction, so the
choice of content yet put up is particularly limited and
random. There is, however, a very large backlog of similar
material waiting to go up and this work is ongoing, further
sets of existing notes being put up here whenever time allows.
These sets of notes have been compiled over the years (most
are dated) either purely out of personal interest as an
exercise in thinking through a topic from first principles in
order to clarify the writer’s own understanding, or as
teaching notes and lecture-handouts done for specific
occasions. They have for the most part been written pretty
much at random whenever the writer’s thoughts happen to have
turned to the topic in question, with no aim then or now to
compile a complete, systematic course in astronomy. The author
has strictly only presumed to write on those subjects which
particularly interest him, on which he is confident he can
write with some authority, and concerning which he has a
particular view or way of doing things which may conceivably
be of interest to others – which is not all
of astronomy!
The sets of notes already in hand nevertheless cover an
extremely wide range of topics, from the early history of
astronomy right down to current cosmology, via optical
principles of telescopes, image-formation and limits of
optical resolution; instrument testing and construction; the
practicalities of astronomical observation; fundamental
astronomy; dynamical & other mathematical astronomy;
gravitation, Newtonian and post-Newtonian; optical
spectroscopy as applied to astronomy; elementary stellar
astrophysics; simple mathematical developments of the basic
principles of atomic physics needed for the last two topics;
quantum mechanics; relativity; the observation and measurement
of visibly-revolving binary stars; and many other things…
Use of mathematics and
physics:
Some of these notes are at least slightly mathematical but
many contain no ‘sums’ at all, and where significant
mathematics is used it is clearly set out from first
principles, nowhere going beyond what should be common
knowledge to any first-year undergraduate in the physical
sciences. Mostly, even in the more mathematical passages,
fairly harmless school mathematics (graphs, quadratic
equations and other elementary algebra, etc) is all that is
involved. The emphasis in all cases is on clear understanding
and rigorous logical deduction as directly as possible from
well-grounded mainstream physical principles. Mathematics
should never be allowed to obscure the physics or the
astronomy. Simplicity is the essence.
Little if any even of this more overtly educational material
is merely a boring recitation of commonplace textbook content,
but a completely independent development of the particular
topic from scratch, from the same first principles (of course)
as the textbooks use. These sets of notes are generally the
result of the writer having sat down with nothing more than
blank paper and pen to answer the question “What is the
clearest, logically most direct and elegant1 way of
explaining this topic?” Existing published accounts of that
then-current topic are never consulted in developing the main
arguments and derivations. Where the resulting method differs
markedly from the consensus of the textbooks (e.g. in the
mathematical theory of Lagrangian
Points), I have prefaced the notes with a critique of
that consensus explaining why I nevertheless believe that not
to be best-possible as a way of developing the subject. The
reader may, of course, agree or disagree.
1
Especially where significant mathematics is used. Some
textbook mathematics in the physical sciences is
repulsively ugly and needlessly complicated.
The whole point of the exercise, and of putting up the results
here, is that we all ‘tick’ mentally in different ways and an
explanation which is a model of clarity to one reader may be
impenetrable to another – so if you’re struggling with the
textbooks, dear reader, try what’s here (if relevant), as it
may just ‘click’ with you in a way that the books don’t (and
textbook writers commonly have an awful habit of merely
copying from each other!). Of course, equally, it may be the
other way round, so if this is your first encounter with a
topic and you find my version ‘clear as mud’, read a good
textbook. Either way, it should do the trick.
Where derivations of important results start from physical
principles and laws of nature, as generally they must, the
writer uses only a minimal set of their most fundamental and
general formulations. He has a deep dislike of long and
convoluted arguments which lose sight of the original first
principles, or which take short-cuts by invoking fancy
theorems the reader is unlikely to have encountered: that way
lies logical coercion of belief, not explanation.
So, all of this is the result of independent thought, starting
from and ending at the same points as you will find in the
textbooks, but sometimes following a significantly different
route in between. Maybe you’ll like this road better, maybe
not. What you will not
find here is ‘Independent’ or ‘Alternative’ thinking which
attempts to repudiate rigorously tested and well-established
mainstream science: if you are seeking support for
‘Counter-Earths’, ‘cold Sun’ theories, non-Doppler
explanations of the cosmological redshift, electromagnetic
‘explanations’ of gravity, and the like, you will have to look
elsewhere. Nor does the writer touch, with the proverbial
bargepole, the wilder speculations on the fringes of cosmology
and theoretical physics, such as the multiverse and string
theory. It will take a very great deal more work by the
proponents of those notions, in producing concrete, testable
predictions, to persuade this writer that their theories are
anything more than articles of theological faith, rather than
real science.
It is planned also to include occasional sets of notes
here dealing purely with applicable mathematics or physics but
only where these have been motivated by, and are directly
relevant to, some topic or problem in astronomy. Any reader
uncertain about these things should begin with the gentle June
2020 piece Seasonal
recurrence of Venus'es apparitions ... in the
'Astronomy and Easy Mathematics' section here, which gives a
striking example of the very simplest of mathematics having
really interesting, non-trivial astronomical consequences
The Author
Failed to see the great sun-grazer Comet Ikeya-Seki in 1965
despite high hopes and fairly determined attempts with the
unaided eye; turned his first telescope on the night sky at
Christmas 1966; first set up the massive, veteran 12½-inch
Newtonian reflector 2 which he still uses, in
November 1967; a few nights before Christmas 1968, he and his
late father had a spectacular view in the 12½-inch of Apollo
8 on its way to the Moon 3 ; and made his
first experiments in both stellar spectroscopy and
aperture-mask interferometry on the 12½-inch in 1971-2 at
about the time he went up to university. At Oxford he read
Physics, scoring alphas in 1975 finals on both assessed
practical lab-work – mostly in atomic spectroscopy – and in
the Theoretical Physics option-paper, something of which he is
inordinately proud.
2 See the
‘Telescopes’ page on www.hanwellobservatory.org.uk
3 See the
author’s piece on Sky & Telescope website www.skyandtelescope.org/observing/stargazers-corner
During graduate research in the Clarendon Laboratory,
Oxford in the later ‘70s the writer took up mathematics
teaching at GCE ‘A’-level and beyond, which then became his
day-job for the next 25 years. The writer was mathematics
tutor of Harris Manchester College, Oxford through the ‘90s
and has extensively taught most areas of mathematics up to
undergraduate level.
Since 1997 Christopher T. has done a substantial amount of
astronomy teaching, including regular evening classes, weekend
residential courses and summer-school 1-week courses, for the
departments of continuing education of both Oxford and
Cambridge Universities:
Regular Oxford astronomy evening classes at O.U.D.C.E. each
term throughout the academic years 1997-2004;
Exploring
Stars and Planets in the department’s summer-school,
August 2000-2003 (general astronomy);
Strange
Universe in the same summer-school, August
2004-2006 (relativity, gravitation, quantum mechanics, black
holes and cosmology, all non-technical);
Herschel’s
Garden: the heavens as natural history in the
Cambridge international science summer-school, July 2004
(stellar & galactic astronomy);
Unmasking
the Universe again in Cambridge (Madingley Hall),
August 2004 (first half of a week’s course taught jointly
with Dr. Robin Catchpole, I.o.A.);
Dance
of the Spheres, a Madingley weekend course,
December 2005 ( classical celestial mechanics/dynamical
astronomy from Newton to the present day – almost entirely
without equations! This used a purely graphical method of
‘Oriented polar direction-fields’ based solely on the energy
and angular-momentum principles, developed specially for the
occasion by this author. This course was a runaway
best-seller, the lecture-room full and a waiting list of a
further dozen hopefuls – which astonished the lecturer.)
Herschel’s
Garden again, this time as a Madingley weekend
course, Sept. 2007;
Medieval
Comets, plenary lecture at the Cambridge Medieval
Studies summer-school, August 2008;
Time
& Tide, a tale of our Moon and others,
Madingley weekend course March 2012 (tidal dynamics in
astronomy using the methods of Dance 2005, especially for
the Earth-Moon system and the possible geophysical impacts
on Earth’s history, life, etc);
The
History of Astronomy a Madingley w/e course split
with Prof. Mike Edmunds and Dr. Allan Chapman, in which
Christopher T. did two lectures on the Herschels, November
2013.
Also, for the U.K. programmes of two US universities:
Einstein,
celebrity & the eclipse of 1919, plenary
lecture for ~ 100 students and faculty of the University of
Georgia summer school at Trinity College, Oxford, July
2019; and most recently,
Astronomy,
an introduction, a full-semester 16-week ‘astronomy
for liberal arts’ course for the Wroxton Abbey study-abroad
campus of Fairleigh Dickinson University, New Jersey,
January-May 2022.
All of the lectures for the above were compiled entirely by
the author and all courses, with the exceptions of the
1997-2004 Oxford evening classes and the two shared Madingley
weekends, were set up from scratch wholly by him. A
representative sample of the more interesting
course-descriptions is included on this website. The writer is
always potentially open to serious requests to run these or
other possible new courses in the UK – if interested, please
write to:
1, The Piggeries,
Hanwell Castle,
nr. Banbury
OX17 1HN
In addition to these there have been one-off talks
delivered at the Museum of the History of Science, Oxford, and
at meetings of the British Astronomical Association (the BAA),
The Society for the History of Astronomy (SHA), UK Space
Council and several UK local astronomy societies. Also notes,
letters and the occasional paper have appeared fairly
regularly in The
Observatory, the Journal
of the BAA, the SHA Bulletin,
the Newsletter of
the BAA Historical Section, etc… and several substantial
observational & historical papers are in the pipeline.
The author is also founder and Director of the Hanwell
Community Observatory in north Oxfordshire (see www.hanwellobservatory.org.uk
)
and, after 55 years ‘at the eyepiece’, remains a very
hands-on, practical astronomer known to some for his work on
visual binary stars, and still very actively observing.
Society memberships:
BAA Winter 1967/8 – 1978; 1992 – the present.
Stratford-on-Avon Astronomical Society 1993 – the present
(founder member).
SHA Summer 2002 – the present (founder member).
FRAS, 2011 – the
present.
Herschel Society 2018 – the present.
Life member of both Oxford and Cambridge university
astronomical societies 1970s – the present.
Attribution &
acknowledgments
You are welcome to use any material on this website but if
copying or quoting content in any publication, printed or
online, please give full acknowledgment of its source.
The author himself gratefully acknowledges the huge help
provided by Dr. Stephen Wass of Polyolbion
Archaeology in the construction and launching of this
website, without which it would not exist
The writer’s 12½-inch reflecting telescope at Hanwell, Oxon,
2018. The corgi provides the scale
INDEX
style="text-align: center;">
Astronomy
Courses
|
Astronomical Optics,
First Principles
|
Atoms and quanta for
astronomy
|
Gravity, Newtonian and
post-Newtonian |
Telescopes, use,
capabilities and evaluation |
Astronomy,
History of
|
Astronomy, Optical
Techniques for
|
Binary stars, visual
observing |
Mathematics
for Astronomy |
Unanswered questions |
Astronomy
and Easy Mathematics |
Astronomical
spectroscopy, visual, first steps in
|
Cosmology
from first principles |
Practical Project
Suggestions |
|
Astronomy, Mathematical
& Dynamical |
Astrophysics, simple
stellar |
Earth-Moon system, tidal
dynamics & ‘evolution’ |
Small-telescope astronomy |
|